-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Sebington
"the very fact that you use the term "check the tags of the sky", no matter how metaphorical it was, shows how removed from reality you are. a person can only ever base their descriptions and perceptions on personal experience." 1. Its a thought experiment, it doesnt have to conform to our world just as long as the example remains logically sound.. 2. according to you peoples perceptions breed their own reality. So how can I possibly be removed from my own reality? I appreciate that music is a subjective experience and what sounds like techno to one person may not do so to another. How ever to suggest that any piece of music can become techno if enough people think its techno, is in my veiw completely ludicrous..
Åtgärder
-
Sebington
"no, _that_ is a load of crap. if someone sees the sky as pink then it is pink to them." Did you actually read my post? I said pretty much that.. ---> "the sky would be pink "in their reality" as you say" Think I should have said it just appears pink... They would be wrong... they could come to see this if they took the time to educate themselves (for example by taking a photo of the sky shining a light though it and study the photons with a spectrometer and compare wavelengths and images to those of a full spectrum.. from this they must conclude that they were wrong... Put simply we should try to educate ourselves on the things that matter us rather than blindly accepting how they appear to us..
Åtgärder
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
baskyl
Interesting point, Sebington - that makes it 1:0 for gameoneterik: The sky is not blue. It's the rays of light beaming thru the atmosphere of the Earth, their reflections are captured by the retina of our eyes and human brains interpret this signal as "blue". The sky itself definetely has no colour of its own. Apart from scientific description - which you sure can't apply on "Techno" - it is personal experience, that charge words (tags, labels) with meaning, connotation and all that semantic jazz.
Åtgärder
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Sebington
What a load of crap... If 75% of the world's population was colour blind in such a way that the sky appeared pink.. the sky would be pink "in their reality" as you say but just because there is more people who believe the sky to be pink than not, does not make the proposition that the sky is pink true. What is more if there is someone who is not colour blind and wants to know the colour of the sky, they check the tags of the colour of the sky, seeing that pink has the largest number of tags, if they choose to pay credence to the tagging system they must believe the proposition that Pink is Blue...
Åtgärder
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Jatup
You couldn't be more wrong. The word techno is a specific genre. If something doesn't fit it, why tag it that way? What's up with people saying "stop classifying music, just enjoy it" anyway? Thanks to tags/genres discovering new music is easier, but in case of techno we have a mix of artists not even close to the actual genre. Because of that I usually omit techno when I talk about my favorite music genres because people don't even know what it is. And how is it an evolution? Is tagging Scooter as rock an evolution too?
Åtgärder
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.
-
Denna hojtning är inte tillgänglig.